User talk:Cacycle: Difference between revisions
(Please see my [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cacycle user talk page on the English Wikipedia]) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Please see my | Please see my | ||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cacycle user talk page on the English Wikipedia]. I am developing the Greasemonkey-compatible Wikipedia / MediaWiki editor [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cacycle/wikEd wikEd]. [[User:Cacycle|Cacycle]] 23:04, 3 September 2010 (UTC) | [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cacycle user talk page on the English Wikipedia]. I am developing the Greasemonkey-compatible Wikipedia / MediaWiki editor [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cacycle/wikEd wikEd]. [[User:Cacycle|Cacycle]] 23:04, 3 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
---- | |||
The example ([[Talk:Location hack#Polling]]) you posted is far too complex and convoluted to use as a test case. | |||
I strongly suspect a side effect of the particular DOM manipulations you are doing to be the root of the problem. | |||
A more appropriate test case might be e.g.: | |||
<pre> | |||
// ==UserScript== | |||
// @name Location Hack Timing | |||
// @description Test the timing of the location hack. | |||
// @include * | |||
// ==/UserScript== | |||
location.href = "javascript:alert('This should show first.');void(0)"; | |||
alert('This should show second.'); | |||
</pre> | |||
In this case, I always see the alerts in the order I expect. | |||
Nonetheless, I created [[Reading Content Globals]] to answer your query. | |||
This should be reliable, not to mention easier to read. | |||
P.S. This isn't WikiPedia, and I don't like "chatting" on wiki pages. | |||
Please head to the mailing list (http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-users) if you need further support. | |||
[[User:Arantius|Arantius]] 15:50, 4 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:50, 4 September 2010
Please see my user talk page on the English Wikipedia. I am developing the Greasemonkey-compatible Wikipedia / MediaWiki editor wikEd. Cacycle 23:04, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
The example (Talk:Location hack#Polling) you posted is far too complex and convoluted to use as a test case. I strongly suspect a side effect of the particular DOM manipulations you are doing to be the root of the problem.
A more appropriate test case might be e.g.:
// ==UserScript==
// @name Location Hack Timing
// @description Test the timing of the location hack.
// @include *
// ==/UserScript==
location.href = "javascript:alert('This should show first.');void(0)";
alert('This should show second.');
In this case, I always see the alerts in the order I expect.
Nonetheless, I created Reading Content Globals to answer your query. This should be reliable, not to mention easier to read.
P.S. This isn't WikiPedia, and I don't like "chatting" on wiki pages. Please head to the mailing list (http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-users) if you need further support. Arantius 15:50, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
