User talk:Marti: Difference between revisions
m (blah blah retesting tt out of template.) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
nextline</pre> | nextline</pre> | ||
<code>Retest</code> | <code>Retest</code> | ||
===Category:Code snippets=== | |||
My idea was, that any article where someone uses [[Template:Good example]] will automatically be listed under [[:Category:Code snippets]]. | |||
The only problem was that the template itself got included into the list since the template contains an example of how the template works... | |||
But try re-adding the category tag and see how convenient it is to have it there. | |||
--[[User:Photodeus|Photodeus]] 11:38, 29 April 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:38, 29 April 2009
{{FULLPAGENAME}}
This wiki's engine is pretty out of date but it isn't that out of date. See: "User talk:Marti"; I was using it on those pages to get alphabetical sort order under "*" for the category (they were out of order). -- BlindWanderer 00:56, 6 April 2009 (EDT)
P.S. You do good work.
I E 7 P r o
Is "I E 7 P r o" a curse word on this wiki (without spaces of course)? -- BlindWanderer 02:04, 6 April 2009 (EDT)
Summaries
You will be pleased to hear I'm going to write a GM script to keep me from submitting until I've written a summary (interesting... when you post a new section there isn't a summary field) -- BlindWanderer 06:22, 6 April 2009 (EDT)
Summaries test
Yes there is... configure you preferences for this wiki... you should have already done that... I also recommend <===(keyword here) that you set minor edits as your default as well and only use major ones for emphasis. Marti 06:32, 6 April 2009 (EDT)
Does this work?
Template:Bad example
This woiks!
Retest
nextline
Retest nextline
Retest
Category:Code snippets
My idea was, that any article where someone uses Template:Good example will automatically be listed under Category:Code snippets. The only problem was that the template itself got included into the list since the template contains an example of how the template works... But try re-adding the category tag and see how convenient it is to have it there. --Photodeus 11:38, 29 April 2009 (EDT)
