Talk:Links: Difference between revisions

From GreaseSpot Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
m (Doubtful that comp scripts will need attention, so removing from want list)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
Any votes against removing it?
Any votes against removing it?


: Go ahead. Firefox 1.0 is obsolete. If anything, [[compiled script]]s can get their own wiki page, with a historical mention of the original compiler. --[[User:Ldrhcp|Ldrhcp]] 20:01, 12 December 2006 (EST)
: Go ahead. Firefox 1.0 is obsolete. If anything, compiled scripts can get their own wiki page, with a historical mention of the original compiler. --[[User:Ldrhcp|Ldrhcp]] 20:01, 12 December 2006 (EST)
::You have a point here. I removed it from the list. --[[User:LouCypher|LouCypher]] 12:46, 14 December 2006 (EST)

Latest revision as of 21:57, 15 December 2007

Seems like a bad idea to link to http://www.letitblog.com/greasemonkey-compiler/ given that it won't work for virtually any browser in use today; relies on the old insecure injection method; doesn't support any GM_ apis.

Any votes against removing it?

Go ahead. Firefox 1.0 is obsolete. If anything, compiled scripts can get their own wiki page, with a historical mention of the original compiler. --Ldrhcp 20:01, 12 December 2006 (EST)
You have a point here. I removed it from the list. --LouCypher 12:46, 14 December 2006 (EST)