Multi Line Strings: Difference between revisions

From GreaseSpot Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(updating casing, info, pros / cons, etc)
(Replaced content with "Modern browsers (including Firefox since version 34) support [https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Template_literals template literals] which...")
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Sometimes, it is desirable to use a multi line string in JavaScript, such as when adding css styles. Here are some approaches, and discussion about the strengths and weaknesses of each approach.
Modern browsers (including Firefox since version 34) support [https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Template_literals template literals] which can span lines.
 
== Concatenation ==
 
The basic method:
 
<pre class='sample'>
var longString = "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, " +
  "venenatis penatibus etiam. " +
  "Nec purus cras elit nec. " +
  "Elit pharetra hymenaeos. " +
  "Donec at cubilia pulvinar elit. " +
  "Aliquet pretium tortor montes maecenas ante amet vel bibendum.";
</pre>
 
Pros:
* Simple to understand.
Cons:
* Extra syntax at the head and tail of every line.
* JavaScript string concatenation has poor performance characteristics.
 
A very similar but more efficient approach would define an array of many strings, then join them into one long string:
 
<pre class='sample'>
var longString = ["Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, ",
  "venenatis penatibus etiam. ",
  "Nec purus cras elit nec. ",
  "Elit pharetra hymenaeos. ",
  "Donec at cubilia pulvinar elit. ",
  "Aliquet pretium tortor montes maecenas ante amet vel bibendum."
  ].join("");
</pre>
 
== Line continuation ==
 
JavaScript can continue lines, via trailing backslashes, like C:
 
<pre class='sample'>
var longString = "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, \
  venenatis penatibus etiam. \
  Nec purus cras elit nec. \
  Elit pharetra hymenaeos. \
  Donec at cubilia pulvinar elit. \
  Aliquet pretium tortor montes maecenas ante amet vel bibendum.";
</pre>
 
Pros:
* Efficient.
Cons:
* An uncommon technique, and is therefore not as well understood.
* Requires extra syntax, albeit not as much as with concatenation.
 
== E4X ==
 
The [https://developer.mozilla.org/en/E4X E4X] technology allows embedding XML documents directly in JavaScript.
It can be used to pull out a (potentially long, multi-line) string from a dummy XML document.
 
<pre class='sample'>
var longString = <str><![CDATA[
  Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet,
  venenatis penatibus etiam.
  Nec purus cras elit nec.
  Elit pharetra hymenaeos.
  Donec at cubilia pulvinar elit.
  Aliquet pretium tortor montes maecenas ante amet vel bibendum.
]]></str>.toString();
</pre>
 
Pros:
* Does not require escape characters for quotes or for new lines; E4X is interpreted verbatim.
Cons:
* Not too efficient; involves the creation and throwaway of an XML DOM.
* Not available in all browsers. For example, Google Chrome does not support E4X.


[[Category:Coding Tips:General]]
[[Category:Coding Tips:General]]

Latest revision as of 19:58, 3 November 2017

Modern browsers (including Firefox since version 34) support template literals which can span lines.