Talk:Include and exclude rules: Difference between revisions
→Hi there: new section |
m Reverted edits by 178.93.25.64 (Talk) to last revision by Gingerhendrix |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
+1 and some action from me, but without the pseudocode I could never have got my head around that regular expression so thanks to whoever wrote it. [[User:Gingerhendrix|Gingerhendrix]] 17:23, 18 December 2006 (EST) | +1 and some action from me, but without the pseudocode I could never have got my head around that regular expression so thanks to whoever wrote it. [[User:Gingerhendrix|Gingerhendrix]] 17:23, 18 December 2006 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 22:43, 12 September 2010
Pseudo-code
It's huge and unhelpful. +1 for removal. Replace with a link to the list of TLDs and mention that two-level "TLDs" are included. --Ldrhcp 23:09, 14 December 2006 (EST)
+1 for removing pseudocode section. possible, direct link: http://www.mozdev.org/source/browse/greasemonkey/src/chrome/chromeFiles/content/convert2RegExp.js?rev=1.5&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup Arantius 10:33, 15 December 2006 (EST)
Agreed; +1 for pseudocode removal. (I added the two-level mention already; not much use discussing something small like that.) --Ecmanaut 09:38, 16 December 2006 (EST)
+1 and some action from me, but without the pseudocode I could never have got my head around that regular expression so thanks to whoever wrote it. Gingerhendrix 17:23, 18 December 2006 (EST)
