Talk:Include and exclude rules: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Hi there: new section |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
+1 and some action from me, but without the pseudocode I could never have got my head around that regular expression so thanks to whoever wrote it. [[User:Gingerhendrix|Gingerhendrix]] 17:23, 18 December 2006 (EST) | +1 and some action from me, but without the pseudocode I could never have got my head around that regular expression so thanks to whoever wrote it. [[User:Gingerhendrix|Gingerhendrix]] 17:23, 18 December 2006 (EST) | ||
== Hi there == | |||
Hi, i tasteful thoughtfulness i'd despatch and exude a build a pure chest of you prepare conception of your blogs layout is unquestionably messed up on the K-Melon browser. Anyhow care for up the shrill work. | |||
Revision as of 10:11, 12 September 2010
Pseudo-code
It's huge and unhelpful. +1 for removal. Replace with a link to the list of TLDs and mention that two-level "TLDs" are included. --Ldrhcp 23:09, 14 December 2006 (EST)
+1 for removing pseudocode section. possible, direct link: http://www.mozdev.org/source/browse/greasemonkey/src/chrome/chromeFiles/content/convert2RegExp.js?rev=1.5&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup Arantius 10:33, 15 December 2006 (EST)
Agreed; +1 for pseudocode removal. (I added the two-level mention already; not much use discussing something small like that.) --Ecmanaut 09:38, 16 December 2006 (EST)
+1 and some action from me, but without the pseudocode I could never have got my head around that regular expression so thanks to whoever wrote it. Gingerhendrix 17:23, 18 December 2006 (EST)
Hi there
Hi, i tasteful thoughtfulness i'd despatch and exude a build a pure chest of you prepare conception of your blogs layout is unquestionably messed up on the K-Melon browser. Anyhow care for up the shrill work.
