Talk:Include and exclude rules: Difference between revisions
From GreaseSpot Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
possible, direct link: http://www.mozdev.org/source/browse/greasemonkey/src/chrome/chromeFiles/content/convert2RegExp.js?rev=1.5&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup | possible, direct link: http://www.mozdev.org/source/browse/greasemonkey/src/chrome/chromeFiles/content/convert2RegExp.js?rev=1.5&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup | ||
[[User:Arantius|Arantius]] 10:33, 15 December 2006 (EST) | [[User:Arantius|Arantius]] 10:33, 15 December 2006 (EST) | ||
Agreed; +1 for pseudocode removal. (I added the two-level mention already; not much use discussing something small like that.) | |||
--[[User:Ecmanaut|Ecmanaut]] 09:38, 16 December 2006 (EST) |
Revision as of 14:38, 16 December 2006
Pseudo-code
It's huge and unhelpful. +1 for removal. Replace with a link to the list of TLDs and mention that two-level "TLDs" are included. --Ldrhcp 23:09, 14 December 2006 (EST)
+1 for removing pseudocode section. possible, direct link: http://www.mozdev.org/source/browse/greasemonkey/src/chrome/chromeFiles/content/convert2RegExp.js?rev=1.5&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup Arantius 10:33, 15 December 2006 (EST)
Agreed; +1 for pseudocode removal. (I added the two-level mention already; not much use discussing something small like that.) --Ecmanaut 09:38, 16 December 2006 (EST)