User talk:Joeytwiddle: Difference between revisions
From GreaseSpot Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Joeytwiddle (talk | contribs) |
m Reply for JoeyTwiddle. |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
This would allow us to define a library script of common functions which we can re-use in any of our userscripts, simply by adding the meta. These library scripts are always loaded from a trusted source, they are local userscripts which do nothing when run alone. | This would allow us to define a library script of common functions which we can re-use in any of our userscripts, simply by adding the meta. These library scripts are always loaded from a trusted source, they are local userscripts which do nothing when run alone. | ||
:Sounds like a good start to a feature request in case the sandbox isn't ever expanded... you may wish to enter an enhancement ticket at http://greasemonkey.devjavu.com/newticket with this instead of the wiki talk pages. It will get the proper attention there. [[User:Marti|Marti]] 04:46, 7 June 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 08:46, 7 June 2009
Suggestions
It could be useful to have one extra meta tag:
The loadlib meta would cause Greasemonkey to load the specified script from the user's gm_scripts/ folder before running the userscript which contained the meta.
This would allow us to define a library script of common functions which we can re-use in any of our userscripts, simply by adding the meta. These library scripts are always loaded from a trusted source, they are local userscripts which do nothing when run alone.
- Sounds like a good start to a feature request in case the sandbox isn't ever expanded... you may wish to enter an enhancement ticket at http://greasemonkey.devjavu.com/newticket with this instead of the wiki talk pages. It will get the proper attention there. Marti 04:46, 7 June 2009 (EDT)
