Talk:Security tips: Difference between revisions
From GreaseSpot Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
voted -1 |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I propose un-doing [http://wiki.greasespot.net/index.php?title=Security_tips&curid=1532&diff=1752&oldid=1751&rcid=254 this revision]. GreaseMonkey scripts always have a wrapper function. See [http://greasemonkey.devjavu.com/projects/greasemonkey/browser/trunk/src/components/greasemonkey.js greasemonkey.js] line 250. | I propose un-doing [http://wiki.greasespot.net/index.php?title=Security_tips&curid=1532&diff=1752&oldid=1751&rcid=254 this revision]. GreaseMonkey scripts always have a wrapper function. See [http://greasemonkey.devjavu.com/projects/greasemonkey/browser/trunk/src/components/greasemonkey.js greasemonkey.js] line 250. | ||
[[User:Arantius|Arantius]] 15:26, 15 March 2007 (EDT) | [[User:Arantius|Arantius]] 15:26, 15 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
--- | |||
: -1. The fact that Greasemonkey wraps scripts in an anonymous function is an irrelevant arcanum. <code>return</code> outside a function, even though it eventually ends up inside a function, is unclear. --[[User:Ldrhcp|Ldrhcp]] 18:16, 15 March 2007 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 22:16, 15 March 2007
I propose un-doing this revision. GreaseMonkey scripts always have a wrapper function. See greasemonkey.js line 250. Arantius 15:26, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
- -1. The fact that Greasemonkey wraps scripts in an anonymous function is an irrelevant arcanum.
returnoutside a function, even though it eventually ends up inside a function, is unclear. --Ldrhcp 18:16, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
