Talk:Include and exclude rules: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 17:50, 3 February 2012

Install this script with the 'raw' link and reload the page, and you'll see an @include without escaped slashes work as intended.

Arantius 16:01, 3 August 2011 (EDT)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-== Pseudo-code ==
+=== regular expressions ===
-It's huge and unhelpful. +1 for removal. Replace with a link to the list of TLDs and mention that two-level "TLDs" are included. --[[User:Ldrhcp|Ldrhcp]] 23:09, 14 December 2006 (EST)
+Install this script with the 'raw' link and reload the page, and you'll see an @include without escaped slashes work as intended.
-----
+https://gist.github.com/1123619
-+1 for removing pseudocode section.
+[[User:Arantius|Arantius]] 16:01, 3 August 2011 (EDT)
-possible, direct link: http://www.mozdev.org/source/browse/greasemonkey/src/chrome/chromeFiles/content/convert2RegExp.js?rev=1.5&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
-[[User:Arantius|Arantius]] 10:33, 15 December 2006 (EST)
-----
-Agreed; +1 for pseudocode removal. (I added the two-level mention already; not much use discussing something small like that.) --[[User:Ecmanaut|Ecmanaut]] 09:38, 16 December 2006 (EST)
-+1 and some action from me, but without the pseudocode I could never have got my head around that regular expression so thanks to whoever wrote it. [[User:Gingerhendrix|Gingerhendrix]] 17:23, 18 December 2006 (EST)
-== Hi there ==
-Hi, i tasteful thoughtfulness i'd despatch and exude a build a pure chest of you prepare conception of your blogs layout is unquestionably messed up on the K-Melon browser. Anyhow care for up the shrill work.